first corinthians
Background
Authorship. Everything about this letter breathes
Pauline authenticity, from his self-identification to details of his relations
with the Corinthians and others to his theology and heart. As a result, “Even
the most imaginative critics find no objection on this point.”[1]
Paul’s
relations with the Corinthians. Paul first visited Corinth during his second
missionary journey (Acts 18:1–18), arriving probably in the spring or summer of
51. There he ministered for the greater part of that mission, about 18 months
(18:11).
He
arrived alone, having left Luke in Philippi, and Silas and Timothy in Berea,
while he proceeded on to Achaia (stopping briefly in Athens, Acts 17:15–34). He
first set about his tent-making trade in collaboration with Aquila and
Priscilla, “reasoning in the synagogue every Sabbath” (18:4). When Silas and
Timothy arrived, apparently with monetary support from the Macedonian
believers, Paul left off tent making, and gave himself completely to Jewish
evangelism. When that played out, as it were, he forsook the Jews and the
synagogue, and turned to Gentile evangelism, ironically using the house next
door to the synagogue as a worship center. Not even violent Jewish opposition
could deter him from teaching the believers as long as
he determined to remain. (As he left, he took Aquila and Priscilla with him
across the Aegean to Ephesus, where he left them, and where they then were used
of God to instruct the gifted Apollos, who later ministered in Corinth, 18:24–28.)
The
greatest part of his third mission was spent ministering at Ephesus (c. 53–56).
While there Paul wrote a letter to Corinth which has not survived to the
present (1 Cor 5:9). A delegation or two from the Corinthian church (1 Cor
1:11; 16:17) then came to Paul in Ephesus describing the problems and posing
the questions which form the background of our 1 Corinthians (cf. 7:1). This
letter was probably written early in the spring (see 1 Cor 16:8) of 55 or 56.
It
seems Paul then made a brief visit to Corinth to deal personally with a problem
involving the man described in 2 Corinthians 2:5; 7:2. Upon his return he
probably wrote another letter which like the first has
not survived (2 Cor 2:4).
Paul
fled from Ephesus after a silversmiths’ riot (Acts 20:1), having already
dispatched Titus to Corinth with the third letter. He was terribly anxious to
meet Titus in Troas, fearing for Titus’s well-being, as well as for the
Corinthians’ favorable and obedient response to his letter. As a result he could not even bring himself to take advantage of
an opportunity to preach the gospel in Troas, but was compelled to cross the
Aegean in search of Titus (2 Cor 2:12–13). The rendezvous could scarcely have
been sweeter, as Titus was well, and he brought Paul good news concerning the
church’s response to the letter (2 Cor 7:6–13).
Yet
he also brought news of a mischievous group of self-styled apostles who sought
to subvert Paul’s authority and theology. He immediately composed our 2
Corinthians, reinforcing his apostolicity and undermining the troublemakers. It
must have arrived only shortly before himself, in his
third visit, autumn–winter 56.
Destination. Corinth’s strategic location at an isthmus
meant the constant traffic of merchants and seamen, bringing not only the
wealth of the world, but also its ideas and its lusts. The city proved most
accommodating to all, earning it an international reputation for trade, vice,
and promiscuity.
It
also had quite a concentration of pagan temples (at least 12). This fact
provides special insight into both the problems of sexual misconduct in the
church (1 Cor. 5:1), since the temple worship often involved ‘sacred’
prostitution, and the eating of meat offered to idols (8:4, et passim).
Message. The letter is comprised mainly of Paul’s
authoritative responses to both the problems described by Chloe’s family
(perhaps chap. 1–6; see 1:11) and the questions raised by the official
delegates (chap. 7–16?; see 16:17 and the periodic
transitional peri de, “now concerning”). The unifying message of the
whole letter centers on proper (mature) Christian behavior, especially as the
corporate body of Christ; thus the issues of love and
unity recur frequently throughout. The other dominant theme is spirituality,
involving the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in the redeemed human
spirit (“inner man”) of saints, which stands in contrast to carnality, undue
attention to things material, including but not limited to the human body, a
very prominent and adaptable problem for the Corinthians.
Argument
In
his salutation Paul introduces the themes of sanctification and unity (1:1–3),
both critical needs in Corinth. Similarly, the rest of the introduction (1:4–9)
emphasizes the themes of spiritual gifts, faithful and holy living, and the
faithfulness of God.
The
first problem to be addressed was disunity, indicative of a fundamental
spiritual weakness in the church. Factionalism is entirely out of order in the church, because every member is identified with the
undivided Lord (1:10–17).
The
theme of wisdom which follows (1:18—2:5) shows that the problem arose from a
sense that one leader was superior to another, and that his followers were
therefore somehow more sophisticated than others’ followers. Paul’s answer
exalts humility, not pride, by showing that in the gospel God deliberately
preferred a “foolish” message, in contempt of human wisdom and power (1:18–25),
in order to shame the self-sufficient (1:26–31). It
was in recognition of this very factor that Paul consciously couched the simple
gospel in simple speech, so as to avoid confusion with
the world’s ‘wisdom,’ and thus to lay a secure foundation for the Corinthians’
progress (2:1–5).
That
is not to say, however, that the Christian message is truly foolish, nor that
Paul never articulated it in its wisdom. On the contrary, in it is heaven’s
greatest wisdom, long reserved as its secrets (2:6–9), and only made known by
special revelation from the mind (Spirit) of God to the minds (spirits) of men
(2:10–13). But because of its quality it could not be disclosed in its fullness
to the immature even of those who had believed. Thus
Paul humbles the Corinthians, styling them not sophisticated, as they would
like to think of themselves, but to the contrary quite immature, as indicated
by their factions, and thus unready to receive spiritual “solid food”
(2:14—3:4).
From
there Paul goes on to warn would-be teachers while he instructs the people. He
begins by describing the proper way for the Corinthians to think of the
Christian ministers they wrongly idolized. He indicates they work together, not
competitively against one another, and more, they work together with Christ
(3:5–9). Second each of these ministers needs to recognize his work will be
judged by Christ as to the motivation behind it (3:10–15); the Lord is fiercely
defensive of his precious temple, the church (3:16–17). In the next paragraph
(3:18–23) he adds that ministers are not to subscribe to worldly wisdom, and
that the people are not to exalt men. In the conclusion he focuses on the
minister’s servant relationship to God, being entrusted with God’s prize
possession, for which trusted service he will stand accountable (4:1–5).
In
his addressing the problem of disunity Paul turns his attention to direct
exhortation (4:6–21). He shows how that his and the other apostles’ (including
Apollos) lives differ from theirs (4:6–13), and then calls on them to follow
his example, first by fatherly appeals (4:14–17), then by threats of fatherly
discipline (4:18–21). Thus he concludes his discussion
of the problem of factions.
Paul
turns next to address three specific problems (5–6). As scandalous as the
incest was, Paul says the church compounded the problem by tolerating it (5:1–2).
He succinctly renders his judgment—apostolic sentence—and apostolic directive
for congregational action (5:3–5). Then he proceeds to instruct the church in
the theology (of ecclesiastical purity) behind such action (5:6–13).
He
treats the next problem in similar fashion (6:1–11).
He condemns the practice of appealing to the civil courts for justice, based on
the theology of the church’s calling to wisdom both now and in the eschaton. He
offers alternative approaches to resolving such conflicts. His conclusion
reviews the doctrine of the believers’ essential distinction from the world,
reinforcing both his reasoning as well as the theology of sanctification.
The
last of these problem areas Paul addresses by tempering—destroying, really—the
worldly logic by which believers were justifying the visiting of prostitutes
(6:12–13). The practice is illegitimate because of (1) the sacredness of the
body, in light of resurrection (6:14); (2) the
incompatibility of oneness with a prostitute and with Christ (6:15–18); and (3)
God’s claim on the body by redemption (6:19–20).
The
church seems to have asked Paul to instruct them concerning marriage and
celibacy (7:1). His first point is that each state is a good gift from God,
celibacy having certain advantages compared to the mutual responsibilities of
marriage (7:1–7). He next instructs the unmarried (7:8–9) as to preferred
legitimate options, and the married (7:10–16) as to marital
responsibilities. He goes on to deal (by
means of two illustrations) with the ‘greener grass syndrome,’ advocating
contentment in one’s present status (7:17–24). His final point is his
commendation of singleness. This he develops first generally, supporting his
contention by the factors of the special stress of the end times (7:25–31)
coupled with the normal stress of marital duties (7:32–35). Then he addresses
two special cases, again permitting marriage while suggesting singleness as
preferable (7:36–40).
The
church’s next question was whether Christians could or should eat meat that had
been offered to idols, to which Paul framed a two-part answer (8–10). First,
based on the principle of voluntary self-restriction from participating in
things permitted by one’s conscience out of love for one’s brother whose
conscience is more restrictive, the idol-meat eaters need to respect the
restrictive consciences of their brothers and avoid offense (cf. 10:23–30).
Second, no Christian should ever participate in the worship of an idol by
eating such meat in an idolatrous festival (cf. 10:14–22).
In
a matter of this sort the fundamental issue is that
that which should dictate one’s behavior is not whether such a behavior is
permissible (i.e., the knowledge of one’s rights), but how one’s brother
is affected by it (the responsibility of love; 8:1–3). Objectively and
intelligently speaking, Paul acknowledges that idol sacrifice is sacrifice to
non-entities, and therefore incapable of defiling meat (8:4–6). Subjectively
and personally speaking, however, some people are wrapped up in superstition.
Love would never trample on their feelings (8:7–13).
The
next chapter is primarily an illustration of how this principle has played out
in his own life (9). Beyond that Paul uses the occasion to defend his
apostleship (9:1–14)—he could have been despised for not receiving monetary
support from the church—and to inspire his readers to give themselves
completely to ministry toward others (9:15–27).
Paul
follows that with the negative example of Israel (10:1–13). Despite their rich
privileges (10:1–4), they suffered plague after plague in judgment for their
sins (10:5–10). This Paul insisted should serve as a warning to his readers not
to presume on their ‘favored status’ with God, while flagrantly ignoring God’s
demand to love (10:11–13).
Paul
sums up his answer to the question of 8:1 with three points. The first two were
noted earlier in introducing this section. His third is all-encompassing: all
Christian behavior is judged by the standard of glorifying God (10:31—11:1).
Next
there were a couple problems in the
area of public worship that Paul had to address (11–14). The first had
to do with women apparently objecting to the bearing of the overt symbols (head
covering) of female submission (11:2–16). Paul’s response consisted of a
declaration of the divinely prescribed order in personal relations (11:2–3),
the importance of the women bearing public expression of their subordination
(11:4–6), and three arguments designed to convince the hearers to comply (11:7–16).
The
second problem area in the Corinthian public worship
concerned the periodic ‘love feast,’ designed for the celebration of the Lord’s
Supper (11:17–34). The passage is filled with irony that that which should
unite has become the occasion of corporate segregation. Paul exposed and
condemned the abuse (11:17–22). He brought his readers back to the original
design of the ordinance (11:23–26). And he warned them of the danger of
continued abuse, alluding to some who had already suffered the ultimate divine displeasure
(11:27–34).
The
last problem area in the Corinthian public worship
concerned the abuse of spiritual gifts—especially the gift of tongues—for
personal prestige rather than for corporate edification (12–14). Paul
approaches the problem from the primary perspective of the unity of the church:
it is united in its confession concerning Christ (12:1–3). Yet that is not to
say the church is characterized by uniformity. On the contrary there is
diversity among the members of the church (12:4–6), by divine design (12:7–11).
This concept Paul illustrates by the analogy of a human body (12:12–31). As in
the human body (12:12–26), so also in the Body of Christ (12:27–31), the member
parts are interdependent: each part is necessary, and
needs every other part. No single part is entirely self-sufficient, possessing
all the gifts, and no gift is possessed by every member.
Thus the governing
principle here (as in the matter of idol-meats) is love (13). Good as gifts
are, their exercise is valueless if loveless (13:1–3). Paul then defines love
in terms of its sterling qualities, distinguishing it from any counterfeits
(13:4–7). He also demonstrates the superiority of love over gifts (represented
by prophecy, knowledge and tongues) by comparing its
infinite durability with the temporality of the gifts (13:8–13).
Paul
next addresses the problem from perhaps a more pragmatic perspective. In
essence he says, if you are going to exalt and emphasize any gift, choose to
emphasize prophecy, because prophecy being intelligible edifies its hearers,
whereas tongues being unintelligible do not edify their hearers (14:1–25). This
he applies by providing concrete regulations to prevent excesses and elevate
the role of prophecy (14:26–33); to which he appends additional limitations
especially on women’s participation in worship (14:34–36). The whole subject of
tongues is summarized in three clear rules (14:37–40).
The
last problem Paul had to address concerned bodily resurrection (15). Some in
the church seem to have sought to syncretize with the gospel the Greek
philosophical dualistic notion of the intrinsic evil of the material world,
implying the desirability of shedding the physical body at death (and perhaps
the epicurean attitude of the indifference of good or evil done in the physical
body; cf. 6:12ff). Paul’s response is first to reassert the centrality of
Christ’s genuine bodily resurrection to the gospel message to which Christians
subscribe (15:1–11). Second, he points out the logical trap of denying
resurrection, that it necessarily leads to the conclusion that we Christians
are not saved from our sins (15:12–19). Third, resurrection is theologically
necessary if Christ is to triumph over all creation, including death (15:20–28).
Fourth, resurrection is implied in various issues of Christian experience
(15:29–34).
Paul’s
introduction of an objector (15:35) leads to his explanation of the nature of
the resurrection body. His comparisons to nature (15:36–41) show a continuity
between, yet with radical transformation from the physical to the “spiritual”
body (15:42–49). He explains finally that this transformation will be the
culminative step in salvation, occurring at ‘the last trumpet,’ and leading
into the fullness of our heavenly inheritance (15:50–57). This (entire) truth
should motivate believers to indefatigable faithfulness (15:58).
As
he begins to bring his letter to a close, Paul speaks of various future
contacts that he and his associates anticipate. The first expected visit was to
involve a special monetary gift for the Jerusalem brothers, concerning which
collection Paul gives direction (16:1–4). Reference to
his and others’ visits is largely informational (16:5–12).
Before
he signs off, he issues two final exhortations which, if followed, would be
conducive to the resolution of perhaps every problem area addressed in the
letter (16:13–18). Even the greetings remind the church of the solidarity of
all believers in love (16:19–24).
Outline
I. Introduction 1:1–9
A. Salutation 1:1–3
1. Senders 1:1
2. Receivers 1:2
3. Greetings 1:3
B. Thanksgiving 1:4–9
1. Past
confirmation of the testimony of Christ 1:4–7a
2. Future
confirmation of the Corinthians by Christ 1:7b–9
II. Division in the church 1:10—4:21
A. Introduction
to the problem 1:10–17
1. Positive
exhortation to unity 1:10
2. Negative
report of disunity 1:11–12
3. Rebuke for disunity 1:13
4. Paul’s
innocence in the matter of the party spirits 1:14–17
a) Paul’s
ministry apart from baptizing
1:14–16
b) Paul’s
commission of gospel preaching 1:17
B. Solutions to
the problem 1:18—4:21
1. Doctrine 1:18—4:5
a) The
simplicity of the message: Christ crucified 1:18—3:4
(1) Its
contradiction of human wisdom
1:18—2:5
(a) God’s
choice: foolish preaching 1:18–25
(b) God’s
purpose: to shame the self-sufficient 1:26–31
(c) Paul’s
commitment to simple preaching 2:1–5
(2) Its
revelation of divine wisdom
2:6—3:4
(a) Its previous
concealment as mystery
2:6–9
(b) Its
disclosure through God’s Spirit 2:10–13
(c) Its
apprehension by spiritual men
2:14—3:4
i)
The contrast between the inability of the natural and the ability of the
spiritual 2:14–16
ii) The
Corinthians’ previous inability 3:1–2a
iii) The
Corinthians’ present inability 3:2b–4
b) The humility
of the messengers: Christ’s servants 3:5—4:5
(1) Their
function in God’s economy
3:5–9
(2) Their
accountability for their work
3:10–17
(a) Reward or loss 3:10–15
(b) Destruction
of the destroyer 3:16–17
(3) Their role
not as masters, but servants
3:18–23
(a) Warning to
‘messengers’ not to subscribe to worldly wisdom 3:18–20
(b) Warning to
the people not to exalt men
3:21–23
(4) The
criterion of their judgment: faithfulness 4:1–5
(a) Their stewardship 4:1–4a
(b) Their
accountability to God
1:4b–5
2. Exhortation 4:6–21
a) Exposure of
Corinthians’ pride in contrast to the apostles’ self-abasement 4:6–13
b) Call to
follow Paul’s example
4:14–21
(1) Fatherly appeal 4:14–17
(2) Fatherly
threat of discipline
4:18–21
III. Disorder in the church 5–6
A. Incest in the
church 5
1. The report 5:1–2
a) The man’s misbehavior 5:1
b) The church’s
failure to take proper action
5:2
2. The
directive: to turn him out to Satan 5:3–5
3. The teaching 5:6–13
a) The purity of
the church 5:6–8
b) The church’s
responsibility to police its own 5:9–13
B. Lawsuits
before the world’s courts
6:1–11
1. The problem 6:1
2. The illogic
of their actions 6:2–11
a) The future
responsibilities and present abilities of believers 6:2–6
(1) Future
judgment of the world and angels 6:2–3
(2) Present competence 6:4–6
b) The
preference of suffering wrong
6:7–8
c) The
spiritual-moral contrast between saints and lost 6:9–11
C. Whoredom by
the saints 6:12–20
1. The
Corinthians’ mistaken carelessness concerning the body 6:12–13a
2. God’s claim
on the body for the future
6:13b–14
3. The
incompatibility of oneness with a prostitute and union with Christ 6:15–18
4. God’s claim
on the body in the present
6:19–20
IV. Difficulties in the church 7–15
A. Concerning
marriage and celibacy
7
1. Avoiding immorality 7:1–7
a) The ideal of celibacy 7:1
b) The sanctity
of sexual relations in marriage 7:2–5
c) The variety
of ‘gifts’ from God
7:6–7
2. Instructions
to the unmarried 7:8–9
a) The
preference of singleness
7:8
b) The
permission of marriage
7:9
3. Instructions
to the married 7:10–16
a) Christian
marriage: Don’t divorce! 7:10–11
b) Mixed marriage 7:12–16
(1) Believer
should not initiate divorce
7:12–14
(2) Believer
should not resist being divorced 7:15–16
4. Instruction
not to seek a change of status 7:17–24
a) The principle 7:17
b) The
illustration of circumcision
7:18–19
c) The
illustration of slavery
7:20–24
5. Instructions
advocating singleness
7:25–40
a) The
advantages of singleness
7:25–35
(1) The present
stress of the world
7:25–31
(2) The added
stress of marriage
7:32–34
(3) Summary 7:35
b) The case of
fathers of girls 7:36–38
(1) Marriage is permissible 7:36
(2) Celibacy is good 7:37
(3) Summary comparison 7:38
c) The case of widows 7:39–40
(1) Remarriage
is permissible 7:39
(2) Widowhood is
better 7:40
B. Concerning
Christian liberty 8:1—11:1
1. The
presenting issue: things sacrificed to idols 8
a) The
superiority of love over knowledge 8:1–3
b) Knowledge of
the unreality of all gods but One 8:4–6
c) Love for
others who do not have this knowledge 8:7–13
(1) Their ignorance 8:7
(2) The danger
of offense 8:8–12
(3) The loving
determination not to offend
8:13
2. The positive
example of Paul’s ministry
9
a) His apostolic
rights (rhetorical questions)
9:1–14
(1) Defense of apostleship 9:1–2
(2) Rights of
eating and drinking
9:3–4
(3) Rights to marriage 9:5
(4) Rights to
receive monetary support
9:6–14
(a) The matter
of his (and Barnabas’) self-support 9:6
(b) The
principle of support
9:6–10
(c) The
application in their ministry
9:11–14
b) His Christian
attitude 9:15–27
(1) Statement of
Paul’s voluntary self-denial
9:15
(2) Statement of
Paul’s inner compulsion to preach 9:16–23
(a) Apart from
external motivation
9:16–18
(b) Ready to
make any sacrifice
9:19–23
(3) Statement of
Paul’s commitment to approval
9:24–27
3. The negative
example of Israel’s failures
10:1–13
a) Reminder of
their opportunities: 5 privileges 10:1–4
b) Application
of their failures: 5 warnings
10:5–10
c) General
application not to presume on one’s ‘favored status’ with God 10:11–13
4. The
applicable principles
10:14—11:1
a) Christian
liberty does not extend into the bounds of idolatrous worship 10:14–22
(1) The
principle of identification between a worshiper and the thing worshiped (10:14–18)
(2) The
application to idol-meats and worship 10:19–22
b) Christian
liberty is not a higher principle than edification 10:23–30
c) All Christian
behavior is judged by the standard of glorifying God 10:31—11:1
C. Public worship 11:2—14:40
1. Veils and
women’s subordinate position
11:2–16
a) Proper order
in personal relations
11:2–3
b) The necessity
of symbolic respect for authority 11:4–6
c) Validation of
Paul’s statement 11:7–16
(1) Created order 11:7–12
(2) Natural
(cultural) ways 11:13–15
(3) Church custom 11:16
2. The Lord’s supper 11:17–34
a) Corinthian abuse 11:17–22
(1) The verdict
of division 11:17–19
(2) The evidence
of self-serving inequality
11:20–21
(3) Apostolic condemnation 11:22
b) Original
divine intent: united memorial 11:23–26
c) Exhortation
to self-examination
11:27–34
(1) The danger
of unworthiness 11:27–30
(2) The
preference of self-judgment
11:31–32
(3) The
prescription to discontinue the abusive practice 11:33–34
3. Concerning
spiritual gifts 12–14
a) The genius of
diversity in unity 12
(1) Divine
source of the concept
12:1–11
(a) Divine
source of Christian confession 12:1–3
(b) Divine
source of variety among Christians 12:4–6
(c) Divine
sovereignty in distribution
12:7–11
(2) The ‘body’ analogy 12:12–31
(a) Introduction 12:12–14
(b) The
principle of interdependence
12:15–26
i)
None should deem himself insignificant: variety is necessary 12:15–20
ii) None should
deem another insignificant: every part deserves honor 12:21–26
(c) The
application of interdependence 12:27–31
b) The priority
of love over gifts 13
(1) Gifts
exercised apart from love are useless 13:1–3
(2) The sterling
qualities of love 13:4–7
(3) The
durability of love
13:8–13
c) The
superiority of prophecy to tongues 14:1–25
(1) The matter
of the church’s benefit
14:1–19
(a)
(Intelligible) Prophecy edifies the hearers 14:1–5
(b) (Unintelligible)
Tongues do not edify the hearers 14:6–19
i)
The principle of intelligibility 14:6–11
ii) Insistence
on intelligibility
14:12–19
(2) The matter
of the world’s response
14:20–25
d) The
regulation of worship
14:26–36
(1) The use of tongues 14:26–33
(a) The
criterion of edification
14:26
(b) Limitations
on tongues 14:27–28
(c) Instructions
for prophecies 14:29–33
(2) Limitations
on women’s participation
14:34–36
e) Summary 14:37–40
(1) Submit to
these instructions
14:37–38
(2) Recognize
gifts according to priority
14:39
(3) Maintain order 14:40
D. Concerning
the resurrection 15
1. Proofs of
physical resurrection
15:1–34
a) The
centrality of resurrection to the gospel 15:1–11
(1) The
Corinthians’ reception of the gospel 15:1–2
(2) The
fundamental components of the gospel 15:3–4
(3) Christ’s
post-resurrection appearances
15:5–10
(4) Summary 15:11
b) The logical
trap of denying resurrection: no salvation 15:12–19
c) The
theological necessity of Christ’s resurrection 15:20–28
(1) To reverse
Adamic curse 15:20–22
(2) For Christ’s
subjection of all things
15:23–28
d) Experiential
arguments for bodily resurrection 15:29–34
(1) Baptism for
the dead 15:29
(2) Gospel
ministers’ exposure to danger
15:30–32
(3) Exhortations
to holy living 15:33–34
2. Explanations
of physical resurrection
15:35–57
a) The nature of
the resurrection body
15:35–49
(1) The
principle of different kinds of bodies 15:35–41
(2) Its
superiority to the present body 15:42–49
b) The occasion
of receiving the resurrection body 15:50–57
(1) The
necessity of transformation
15:50
(2) The
experience of transformation
15:51–53
(3) The victory
of transformation
15:54–57
3. Implication
of physical resurrection: faithfulness 15:58
V. Directives and information concerning
future contacts 16:1–12
A. Directives
concerning the collection
16:1–4
1. Its collection 16:1–2
2. Its administration 16:3–4
B. Information
concerning Paul’s upcoming visit 16:5–9
C. Directive to
respect Timothy in his coming visit 16:10–11
D. Information
concerning Apollos’ absence
16:12
VI. Closing 16:13–24
A. Final exhortations 16:13–18
1. Faithfulness
and love 16:13–14
2. Submission to
worthy leaders 16:15–18
B. Greetings 16:19–24
Up to 25% of this content without modification may be quoted. Notice of copyright must appear with the quotation as follows:
Quotations from "The Arguments of the Books of THE NEW/OLD TESTAMENT" by Dr. Gary Tuck. Copyright © 2021
This work is copyrighted. Right to reproduce the contents is restricted to written permission from the author.