nahum
Background
Author. Mentioned only once in the Bible (1:1), the
only biographical fact known of this prophet is that he was an “Elkoshite,”
concerning which La Sor says, “Even his hometown, Elkosh
(1:1), has defied identification, although sites in Assyria, Galilee, and Judah
have been suggested.”[1]
Date
of composition.
Since the book lacks chronological specifiers, various dates have been
proposed. The surest terminus is the ad quem
date of the actual fall of Nineveh in 612. The terminus a quo is probably the 663 destruction
of Thebes (3:8). (Ellison lists six possible dates for this destruction, and
prefers that of 710.[2])
Beyond this, Maier prefers a date soon after 663, since Thebes was rebuilt in
654.[3]
On the other hand, La Sor prefers a date shortly before 612, based on “the tone
of imminence throughout the book.”[4]
That imminence seems a rather weak point, as Assyria also seems too weak to be
regarded any kind of threat at that time. Prefer a date around 660.
Historical
setting.
Nineveh had an extreme and well-deserved reputation for cruelty.[5]
Despite the repentance of Jonah’s day, the nation was consumed with rapacity
and a lust for expansion. Her army besieged Samaria and toppled her; and within
two decades gobbled up some forty-six Judean towns and was poised to overrun
Jerusalem (see 2 Kings 18:13—19:37), only to be supernaturally decimated
(19:35).
Judah
at the time was ruled by her wickedest king, Manasseh, who at some
time—probably late in his reign—was deported to Babylon by the Assyrian army
and subsequently released (2 Chron. 33:11–13).
Argument
Nahum
may be regarded in a sense as a historical sequel to the book of Jonah: where
Jonah preached repentance upon pain of the doom of Nineveh in the eighth
century, Nahum in the seventh century announced the irrevocable fall of the
city.
While
the burden of the prophecy is absorbed with the destruction of Nineveh, it must
be remembered that it was written for Judah, not Assyria. It is thus a message
of consolation—in the form of announcement of “vengeance” (1:2)—to Judah that
her mortal enemy, Assyria, will fall. It also contains a positive message of
hope for Judah, if ever so faint: 1:15; 2:2. The prophecy is broadly arranged
around the announcement (1), description (2), and desert (3) of God’s judgment
on Nineveh.
In
announcing the judgment on Nineveh the prophet begins
by portraying God as a God of wrath (1:2–8). Thus the
tone and justification for the prophecy are set. While the Assyrians may have
had no conscious intention to “devise against the Lord” (1:9; though see the
Rabshakeh, Isaiah 36:7, 15, 18–20), but assumed they had simply to deal with
the mortals of Judah, the prophet announces that the Assyrian aggressions
against Judah amount to evil plots against Yahweh (1:11). Because of Yahweh’s
disposition toward sin and the Assyrians’ challenge to Yahweh himself, the
demise of Nineveh was unavoidable; and this same Yahweh would certainly relieve
his people of Judah (1:12–15).
Her
fall could then be described in terms of the military defeat (2:1–8) and the
subsequent plundering (2:9–13).
Finally the reasons for
her overthrow are detailed. Her sins of brutality (3:1–3), prostitution, and
sorcery (3:4) must ultimately bring shame (3:5–7). There would come a kind of
poetic justice, in the form of destruction mirroring her destruction of Thebes,
a particularly brutal conquest (3:8–11). To answer the Assyrian denials based
on their ‘impregnable’ defenses, a source of great pride, the prophecy
concludes with the prediction that all their great defense will be to no avail
when Yahweh comes in judgment (3:12–19).
Outline
I. Title 1:1
II. God’s judgment on Nineveh announced 1:2–15
A. God’s
attribute of wrath 1:2–8
B. Nineveh’s
guilty devices against God
1:9–11
C. Nineveh’s
demise and Judah’s relief
1:12–15
III. God’s judgment on Nineveh described 2
A. Nineveh’s defeat 2:1–8
B. Nineveh’s plundering 2:9–13
IV. God’s judgment on Nineveh deserved 3
A. Nineveh’s sins 3:1–4
B. Nineveh’s shame 3:5–7
C. Nineveh’s
fate: to mirror that of Thebes 3:8–11
D. Nineveh’s
inadequate defense
3:12–19
Up to 25% of this content without modification may be quoted. Notice of copyright must appear with the quotation as follows:
Quotations from "The Arguments of the Books of THE NEW/OLD TESTAMENT" by Dr. Gary Tuck. Copyright © 2021
This work is copyrighted. Right to reproduce the contents is restricted to written permission from the author.